Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program
Identifieur interne : 000F88 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000F87; suivant : 000F89Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program
Auteurs : A. Kalender [Turquie] ; K. Orhan [Turquie] ; U. Aksoy [Turquie]Source :
- Clinical Anatomy [ 0897-3806 ] ; 2012-07.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Logiciel.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Accessory, Amfs, Anat, Anatomical structures, Anatomical variations, Anteroinferior, Apinhasmit, Cbct, Cbct evaluation, Cbct examinations, Cbct scans, Closest tooth, Cone beam, Conventional radiographs, Dental status, Dentate, Dentate patients, Dentomaxillofac, Dentomaxillofacial radiology, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Female patients, Foramen, Horizontal dimension, Horizontal size, Imaging, Kennedy class, Lower border, Ludlow, Male patients, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular canal, Mental foramen, Mental foramina, Mental nerve, Molar, Naitoh, Online issue, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Other studies, Premolar, Previous studies, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiol, Right sides, Same patient, Second premolar, Software, Surg, Tomography, Tomography images, Turkish patients, Turkish population, Vertical dimension, Vertical size.
- Teeft :
- Accessory, Amfs, Anat, Anatomical structures, Anatomical variations, Anteroinferior, Apinhasmit, Cbct, Cbct evaluation, Cbct examinations, Cbct scans, Closest tooth, Cone beam, Conventional radiographs, Dental status, Dentate, Dentate patients, Dentomaxillofac, Dentomaxillofacial radiology, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Female patients, Foramen, Horizontal dimension, Horizontal size, Imaging, Kennedy class, Lower border, Ludlow, Male patients, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular canal, Mental foramen, Mental foramina, Mental nerve, Molar, Naitoh, Online issue, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Other studies, Premolar, Previous studies, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiol, Right sides, Same patient, Second premolar, Software, Surg, Tomography, Tomography images, Turkish patients, Turkish population, Vertical dimension, Vertical size.
Abstract
This study determined the occurrence and location of the mental foramen (MF) and accessory mental foramen (AMF) in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed‐tomography (CBCT) with 3D‐imaging software. CBCT scans of 386 sites in 193 (92 male, 101 female) patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine MF and AMF occurrence, sizes, and locations. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data were transferred to surface‐rendering software to generate 3D images. Distances between the MF and AMF and from both foramina to the alveolar ridge and to the closest tooth were measured. Differences in AMF incidence by sex, side, and location were evaluated using chi‐squared tests, and MF and AMF measurements were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U‐tests. AMFs were observed in 6.5% of patients and were most commonly in an anteroinferior location. Mean AMF size did not differ significantly by sex or side [males: horizontal = 1.5 mm (1.0–2.4 mm), vertical = 1.4 mm (0.8–2.4 mm); females: horizontal = 1.5 mm (0.8–3 mm), vertical = 1.3 mm (0.8–2.1 mm); P > 0.05]. Males showed significantly greater mean vertical and horizontal MF dimensions compared with females [males: horizontal = 3.9 mm (1.0–7.0 mm), vertical = 3.6 mm (1.2–7.0 mm); females: horizontal = 3.5 mm (1.3–5.6 mm), vertical = 3.3 mm (0.8–5.8 mm); P < 0.05]. Awareness of the AMF is important to avoid mental nerve damage during surgical intervention and anesthetic applications. CBCT is useful for AMF detection, distributes less ionizing radiation, and allows 3D imaging. Clin. Anat. 25:584–592, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/ca.21277
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FDBBEA163A6E46A80DD9E9C8CEF6946895839C87Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program</title><author><name sortKey="Kalender, A" sort="Kalender, A" uniqKey="Kalender A" first="A." last="Kalender">A. Kalender</name></author><author><name sortKey="Orhan, K" sort="Orhan, K" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="K." last="Orhan">K. Orhan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Aksoy, U" sort="Aksoy, U" uniqKey="Aksoy U" first="U." last="Aksoy">U. Aksoy</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FDBBEA163A6E46A80DD9E9C8CEF6946895839C87</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/ca.21277</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FDBBEA163A6E46A80DD9E9C8CEF6946895839C87/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007D57</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007D57</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007D57</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000F88</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000F88</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program</title><author><name sortKey="Kalender, A" sort="Kalender, A" uniqKey="Kalender A" first="A." last="Kalender">A. Kalender</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Endodontics, Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Mersin</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Orhan, K" sort="Orhan, K" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="K." last="Orhan">K. Orhan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, University of Ankara, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Mersin</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence address: Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, University of Ankara, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aksoy, U" sort="Aksoy, U" uniqKey="Aksoy U" first="U." last="Aksoy">U. Aksoy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Endodontics, Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Mersin</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Anatomy</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ANATOMY</title><idno type="ISSN">0897-3806</idno><idno type="eISSN">1098-2353</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="584">584</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="592">592</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-07">2012-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0897-3806</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0897-3806</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accessory</term><term>Amfs</term><term>Anat</term><term>Anatomical structures</term><term>Anatomical variations</term><term>Anteroinferior</term><term>Apinhasmit</term><term>Cbct</term><term>Cbct evaluation</term><term>Cbct examinations</term><term>Cbct scans</term><term>Closest tooth</term><term>Cone beam</term><term>Conventional radiographs</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate patients</term><term>Dentomaxillofac</term><term>Dentomaxillofacial radiology</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Female patients</term><term>Foramen</term><term>Horizontal dimension</term><term>Horizontal size</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Kennedy class</term><term>Lower border</term><term>Ludlow</term><term>Male patients</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular canal</term><term>Mental foramen</term><term>Mental foramina</term><term>Mental nerve</term><term>Molar</term><term>Naitoh</term><term>Online issue</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiol</term><term>Right sides</term><term>Same patient</term><term>Second premolar</term><term>Software</term><term>Surg</term><term>Tomography</term><term>Tomography images</term><term>Turkish patients</term><term>Turkish population</term><term>Vertical dimension</term><term>Vertical size</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Accessory</term><term>Amfs</term><term>Anat</term><term>Anatomical structures</term><term>Anatomical variations</term><term>Anteroinferior</term><term>Apinhasmit</term><term>Cbct</term><term>Cbct evaluation</term><term>Cbct examinations</term><term>Cbct scans</term><term>Closest tooth</term><term>Cone beam</term><term>Conventional radiographs</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate patients</term><term>Dentomaxillofac</term><term>Dentomaxillofacial radiology</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Female patients</term><term>Foramen</term><term>Horizontal dimension</term><term>Horizontal size</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Kennedy class</term><term>Lower border</term><term>Ludlow</term><term>Male patients</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular canal</term><term>Mental foramen</term><term>Mental foramina</term><term>Mental nerve</term><term>Molar</term><term>Naitoh</term><term>Online issue</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiol</term><term>Right sides</term><term>Same patient</term><term>Second premolar</term><term>Software</term><term>Surg</term><term>Tomography</term><term>Tomography images</term><term>Turkish patients</term><term>Turkish population</term><term>Vertical dimension</term><term>Vertical size</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Logiciel</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study determined the occurrence and location of the mental foramen (MF) and accessory mental foramen (AMF) in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed‐tomography (CBCT) with 3D‐imaging software. CBCT scans of 386 sites in 193 (92 male, 101 female) patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine MF and AMF occurrence, sizes, and locations. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data were transferred to surface‐rendering software to generate 3D images. Distances between the MF and AMF and from both foramina to the alveolar ridge and to the closest tooth were measured. Differences in AMF incidence by sex, side, and location were evaluated using chi‐squared tests, and MF and AMF measurements were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U‐tests. AMFs were observed in 6.5% of patients and were most commonly in an anteroinferior location. Mean AMF size did not differ significantly by sex or side [males: horizontal = 1.5 mm (1.0–2.4 mm), vertical = 1.4 mm (0.8–2.4 mm); females: horizontal = 1.5 mm (0.8–3 mm), vertical = 1.3 mm (0.8–2.1 mm); P > 0.05]. Males showed significantly greater mean vertical and horizontal MF dimensions compared with females [males: horizontal = 3.9 mm (1.0–7.0 mm), vertical = 3.6 mm (1.2–7.0 mm); females: horizontal = 3.5 mm (1.3–5.6 mm), vertical = 3.3 mm (0.8–5.8 mm); P < 0.05]. Awareness of the AMF is important to avoid mental nerve damage during surgical intervention and anesthetic applications. CBCT is useful for AMF detection, distributes less ionizing radiation, and allows 3D imaging. Clin. Anat. 25:584–592, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li></country></list><tree><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Kalender, A" sort="Kalender, A" uniqKey="Kalender A" first="A." last="Kalender">A. Kalender</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Aksoy, U" sort="Aksoy, U" uniqKey="Aksoy U" first="U." last="Aksoy">U. Aksoy</name><name sortKey="Orhan, K" sort="Orhan, K" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="K." last="Orhan">K. Orhan</name><name sortKey="Orhan, K" sort="Orhan, K" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="K." last="Orhan">K. Orhan</name><name sortKey="Orhan, K" sort="Orhan, K" uniqKey="Orhan K" first="K." last="Orhan">K. Orhan</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F88 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000F88 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FDBBEA163A6E46A80DD9E9C8CEF6946895839C87
|texte= Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone‐beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |